Profile picture for user Scherma3

I'm hoping someone can help.  As part of our Governance process, the first initial step is to validate the ARIS model against the structure rules utilized in the semantic check functionality.  After selecting the options to display the output statistics, indicate errors by the use of information marks in the model, and derive improvment proposals and tasks from errors, the program runs and displays both the model with the errors, and an output summary.

Unfortunately, the summary reads like a book in Latin, if you will, ( hard to understand ) and does not clarify how the errors on the semantic check corresponds to the "errors" on the model highlighted in color.

Am wondering if the Description of a Structure Rule is configurable, or is this standard?  See below as an example. Am hoping it is....

Description: This rule checks whether all events that activate a function or are generated by a function in the selected model also exist as start or end events in each process model assigned to the function. Process interfaces are ignored. If rules are placed between the function and the activating or generated events, these events must also exist in every process model.

Any help or advise would be not only welcomed but encouraged!

Martha

 

by Donald Dillon
Posted on Wed, 04/21/2010 - 16:49

Martha,

With Script Admin priviliges you can edit the properties of the rule, (name and description).  At a previous ARIS job we found great value in renaming the descriptions to assist in the Semantic check error cleanup. 

Administration

          Server

                Evaluations

                         Semantic checks

                                  rule types

                                          Rule

Right mouse click-properties.

Same applies for profiles.

 

I feel this is an underutilized function, Semantic check descriptions feel like they were written by IT colleagues and not for business users.

Good Luck

 

0
by Martha Scherer Author
Posted on Tue, 04/27/2010 - 18:04

In reply to by harryratia

Mr. Dillon,

Thank you for your easy to understand feedback, as I forwarded the info on to our EA's group as a suggestion.  In addition, I was wondering if I could join in future discussions on how ARIS could be improved, at least from an end-user standpoint.  I believe this was mentioned in the last ARIS User webcast a couple of weeks ago.  Please advise as to next steps.

Martha Scherer

 

 

 

0

Featured achievement

Rookie
Say hello to the ARIS Community! Personalize your community experience by following forums or tags, liking a post or uploading a profile picture.
Recent Unlocks

Leaderboard

|
icon-arrow-down icon-arrow-cerulean-left icon-arrow-cerulean-right icon-arrow-down icon-arrow-left icon-arrow-right icon-arrow icon-back icon-close icon-comments icon-correct-answer icon-tick icon-download icon-facebook icon-flag icon-google-plus icon-hamburger icon-in icon-info icon-instagram icon-login-true icon-login icon-mail-notification icon-mail icon-mortarboard icon-newsletter icon-notification icon-pinterest icon-plus icon-rss icon-search icon-share icon-shield icon-snapchat icon-star icon-tutorials icon-twitter icon-universities icon-videos icon-views icon-whatsapp icon-xing icon-youtube icon-jobs icon-heart icon-heart2 aris-express bpm-glossary help-intro help-design Process_Mining_Icon help-publishing help-administration help-dashboarding help-archive help-risk icon-knowledge icon-question icon-events icon-message icon-more icon-pencil forum-icon icon-lock