Profile picture for user m3b

Hi guys,

How would you implement a Business Glossary in Aris Architect?

Basically, each term/concept of the glossary would have the following attributes :

  • descriptions
  • source of descriptions
  • synonyms
  • other related concepts
  • business owner
  • "golden source" (IT systems that hold "golden records")
  • etc ...

The business glossary granularity would range from "business entities" ( for example Item) to "business entities attributes" (for example item part number)

I'm new to Aris. I guess the "Technical terms" (or a customized version of it) would be a good candidate but any ideas are welcome!

by M. Zschuckelt
Posted on Thu, 02/21/2019 - 12:29

Hi Michel,

Technical term is the right candidate. It is intended for exactly that purpose. "Technical terms model" is the place for your glossary.

Don't try to do your data modelling with that object though. "Entities" and "Attributes" are concepts distinct from terminology. Terminology can occur almost anywhere, e. g. in processes. Candidates for entities are "Cluster/data model" for a "Business object" (an arbitrary collection of business information in a process context), "Entity type" for object types of the real world described by a common set of attribute types. And those are "ERM attribute types". I recommend "IE data model" for entity relationship modelling.

0
by Michel Bénard Author
Posted on Thu, 02/21/2019 - 13:30

Thanks for the tips!

Concerning entity relationship modeling, I prefer the more compact IE data model notation, but I think I'll go for the Chen notation (Aris eERM diagram) because I need to model ternary relationships at the enterprise data model level (e.g. part, supplier, customer) which is not possible with IE Data Model notation.

 

0
by M. Zschuckelt
Posted on Thu, 02/21/2019 - 19:54

Well then, if you miss anything with the eERM diagrams, don't hesitate to adapt the ARIS method with what you need. If you don't have the possibility to adapt the method due to license restrictions, validate your use cases well before making the final decision. Ternary relationships would be another entity in IE data model notation. You should find good names for them in Chen notation as well. After all the differences are not as big, I reckon. It's a philosophical debate, what's a relationship and what's an entity. The advantage of IE data modelling is that you have less object types to govern.

0

Featured achievement

Question Solver
Share your expertise and have your answer accepted as best reply.
Recent Unlocks
  • CP
  • BZ
  • Profile picture for user TEF_Bernd
  • ПЦ
  • CR
  • PacMan

Leaderboard

|
icon-arrow-down icon-arrow-cerulean-left icon-arrow-cerulean-right icon-arrow-down icon-arrow-left icon-arrow-right icon-arrow icon-back icon-close icon-comments icon-correct-answer icon-tick icon-download icon-facebook icon-flag icon-google-plus icon-hamburger icon-in icon-info icon-instagram icon-login-true icon-login icon-mail-notification icon-mail icon-mortarboard icon-newsletter icon-notification icon-pinterest icon-plus icon-rss icon-search icon-share icon-shield icon-snapchat icon-star icon-tutorials icon-twitter icon-universities icon-videos icon-views icon-whatsapp icon-xing icon-youtube icon-jobs icon-heart icon-heart2 aris-express bpm-glossary help-intro help-design Process_Mining_Icon help-publishing help-administration help-dashboarding help-archive help-risk icon-knowledge icon-question icon-events icon-message icon-more icon-pencil forum-icon icon-lock