Hello,
is anybody using the conversation diagram? The modeltype "BPMN conversation diagram (BPMN 2.0)" is not compliant with the BPMN specification. Some examples: It does not show the conversation link as double line, the pool name is not separated by a single line, a pool has no marker "multi instance pool" and does not allow inline modeling of a process (can only be done by assignment). The sub-conversation is available but it is not possible to show e.g. inline messageflows or more detailed conversations with different keys.
How do you handle it? Is ther a more compliant modeltype available?
Regards
Klemens
