5 Replies
-
I was curious how Chuck could turn the modeling convention of the Event-driven Process Chain (EPC) upside down. So I asked him how he did that and he just sent a screenshot proving him right:
Do you agree on this? Or could this be a fake model?
Cheers
Rune -
The funny thing is, that the enemy is defeated whithout Chuck doing anything...
-
If the first event were 'Enemy sees Chuck' then the result could be 'Enemy is defeated'
-
Donald, at first I thought the same way. But my 2nd thought was about a "self-fulfilling event".
As you can imagine Chuck don't need to do anything but something happens anyway, which is in EPC notation nothing else than the absence of a function.
Of course some 'trigger' is needed. And that is that Chuck has to become aware of a enemy.
Your variant, that the 'Enemy sees Chuck' could be followed only by 'Enemy is instantly dead' for matching Chuck's modeling convention.
I think for Chuck's modeling convention we need another thread. I bet he is also able to let an event to decide which function is triggered.
And who knows, in case Chuck visits ProcessWorld, Sebastian will blog it. I don't wanna miss that chance, so I'll be in Berlin Mon til Wed. And I think I saw your name, too.
Cheers
Rune -