How to determine the assignment among object occurrence and model?

Hi,

I did not get the point actually... assignments are not based on object occurrences, but assignments.

So, if you really have 2 occurrences of the same object definition:

1.) they cannot have different names, since the name is defined at the object definition, not the occurrence



2.) the assigments are the same, since the assignment is also defined at the object definition.

So maybe you made a definition copy? Thus, an additional copy of the object definition will be created and therefore, the definition can have other model assignments.

Bye,

Frank

Sorry, I meant OccA and OccB in the sense of identification for this example. Of course the label would be the same.

Currently I am dealing with a set of EPC models where most objects do have multiple models assigned. This really confuses me because I do not necessarily understand why an object would have multiple different EPC models assigned. If I could I would like to know the intention of the modeller. What could be the reason for this?!

Semantically speaking this only makes sense when you look at the occurrences of the same object in different models. In model A you would need to click on the assignment symbol beside an occurrence and select one of the assigned model, whereas a different assigned model would need to be chosen when another occurrence of the same object but in model B is selected.

Thanks,

Ralf

Hi,

well, I would say, if multiple EPCs are allowed as sub processes, these should be the same, independently where the function is placed. The general question is: does it make sense whether multiple EPCs can be assigned to sub processes.

Right now, my personal interpretation is: "no". But that is just my humble opinion. There most likely are customers having "pro" arguments for that.

Bye,

Frank